Accueil

Information Centre

Use the menus below to browse our collection of information resources on Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection. You can search the database by subject matter and content type, as well as sort by any of the headings.

If you have information that you would like to submit please contact us at glu@glu.org.

Titre Description Organization Date publishedicone de tri Content Type
Resolution Opposing Open Water Aquaculture Facilities in the Great Lakes

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United support a moratorium on new open water aquaculture facilities until a proven method for environmental assessment can be used to critically examine the suitability and placement of new facilities and during permit reviews in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution Applauding Canada’s Decision to Ratify the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, and Calling on the US Senate to Ratify the Convention in this Session

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United: Congratulates Canada and applauds its action to become the first country to ratify the
Stockholm Convention on POPs; Urges President Bush, through his staff and advisors, to expeditiously transmit the POPs Treaty to the US Senate for its “advice and consent” to ratification; Urges the United States Senate to ratify the Stockholm Convention in this first session of the 107th Congress so that the United States will also be one of the early countries to ratify the Convention and set an example of leadership for other countries to follow.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution to promote the Canadian Coalition for Green Healthcare

Therefore, be it resolved that Great Lakes United promote the goals of Health Care
Without Harm and the Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on the Extraction of Sunken Logs from Lakes and Rivers

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United calls for a moratorium on new permits for sunken log extraction in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin.
Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United calls for environmentally sound scientific criteria for the issuance of permits across the wide range of aquatic habitats in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on Promoting Sustainable Food System Support

Therefore, be it resolved that Great Lakes United, wherever possible, source food and farm products locally, with a preference for organically grown products.
Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United, wherever possible, sign on to sustainable food and food system policies. Be it further resolved that Great Lakes United urge and support its network to do the
same.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution to Request the United States and Canadian Governments to Negotiate a Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Biodiversity and Habitat Agreement

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United request the United States and Canadian governments to negotiate a new agreement on Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River
biodiversity and habitat for the protection and restoration of the Great Lakes-St.
Lawrence River ecosystem.

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on the Prevention of Aquatic Nuisance Species Introductions into the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin

Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada and the United States to: Assess all vectors of ANS introductions, including intentional and unintentional, into the Great Lakes and determine the relative risk of each vector. Develop an action plan to prioritize and prevent ANS introductions from all vectors with set implementation deadlines. Develop mandatory federal enforcement programs for implementation of the action plan insuring provisions for citizen suit. Set criteria and standards for ballast water treatment and management that are subject to guaranteed periodic review and revision and that effectively reduce transfers of invasive organisms into and within the Great Lakes. Create and implement a thorough and effective screening process to ensure all policies, treatments and technologies are environmentally sound (as defined in the National Invasive Species Act).

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on the prevention of aquatic nuisance species introductions into the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin

Therefore be it resolved that Great Lakes United urges the governments of Canada and the United States to: Assess all vectors of ANS introductions, including intentional and unintentional, into the Great Lakes and determine the relative risk of each vector. Develop an action plan to prioritize and prevent ANS introductions from all vectors with set implementation deadlines. Develop mandatory federal enforcement programs for implementation of the action plan insuring provisions for citizen suit. Set criteria and standards for ballast water treatment and management that are subject to guaranteed periodic review and revision and that effectively reduce transfers of invasive organisms into and within the Great Lakes. Create and implement a thorough and effective screening process to ensure all policies, treatments and technologies are environmentally sound (as defined in the National Invasive Species Act).

Great Lakes United Jun 10 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution Opposing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Great Lakes Navigation System Review

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United calls on the U.S. Congress to immediately stop the Great Lakes Navigation System review, and calls on the Canadian Government to withhold financial or administrative support to the said study.

Great Lakes United Jun 9 2001 Great Lakes United resolution
Manufacturer responsibility for toxic substances in the product

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry".

In this presentation extended producer responsibility is introduced and the activities at University of Massachusetts' Toxic Use Reduction Institute explained.

University of Massachusetts Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Environmental Impacts from End-Life Vehicles

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the end-of-life impacts of vehicles is assessed

Environmental Defense Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Economic Costs of Automotive Mercury Recycling

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the cost of recycling mercury from cars is discussed.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Mercury Pollution from Automobile Recycling

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the impacts of mercury pollution from car recycling is explored.

Ecology Center Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Extended Producer Responsibility policy approach to solving environmental impacts of disposing and recycling end-of-life vehicles: the case of the European Union ELV directive

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation European policies for end of life vehicles is explored.

University of Tennessee Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Implementing EPR regulations and programs in North America

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the barriers and benefits to EPR regulations in North American are explored.

Environment Canada Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
The US Carpet Recycling Industry

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation carpet recycling in the US is discussed.

Office of Environmental Assistance, State of Minnesota Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Promoting EPR in the Civil Society

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the possibilities for EPR adoption are explored.

Canadian Auto Workers Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
The Clean Car Campaign

Notes from a presentation at Great Lakes United's 2001 workshop, "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Automotive Industry". In this presentation the successes and challenges of the Clean Car Campaign are explored.

Clear Car Campaign Feb 21 2001 Conference proceedings
Toxics in Vehicles: Mercury

The United States had a record 210 million automobiles on the road in 1999, up 15 million from 1994, and the total for all of North America in 1996 was more than 235 million. Each year, some 12 million of these vehicles are retired from useful life. Many of the materials used in their production create problems along the way, either in the vehicleÕs manufacture, use or end-of-life. This report examines the historic and continuing use of the highly toxic metal mercury in automobiles and estimates its releases to the environment from end-of-life vehicle (ELV) processing. The report will show that emissions from vehicle recycling and disposal processes are one of the largest sources of mercury contamination to the environment. The report also examines strategies for cleaner production and proposes key policy solutions to eliminate mercury hazards from both new and existing vehicles. 

Ecology Center; Great Lakes United; University of Texas Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies Jan 21 2001 Report
Practical Problems with POPs Exemptions How U.S.-Proposed General Exemptions Undermine the International POPs Treaty

The United States government has proposed that a number of general exemptions be included in the international treaty on persistent organic pollutants (POPs). This document explains how these exemptions will undermine the treaty.

Great Lakes United; Pesticide Action Network Nov 17 2000 Report
The Pollution of Pisces: Fish Advisories and Chemical Contaminants in the Great Lakes States

Fish advisories are warnings to the public from state health departments and federal agencies that eating certain fish poses a danger to health because of chemical contamination. They provide graphic public testimony to the risks chemical contamination poses to local and regional ecosystems. The Great Lakes region of the United States contains a disproportionate share of the nation’s fish advisories. While the states bordering the Great Lakes account for 27 percent of the nation’s people, they are home to 75 percent of the nation’s fish advisories and 72 percent of all of the nation’s fish advisories due to POPs contamination. Fully 100 percent of the Great Lakes waters and their connecting waters are under advisories.

Clean Water Fund; Ecology Center; Great Lake United; Lake Michigan Federation; Michigan Environmental Council; Sierrra Club Great Lakes Office Nov 16 2000 Report
A Resolution to Develop a Lakewide Management Plan for Lake Huron

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that Great Lakes United spare no effort to convince the
parties that all five Great Lakes must have LAMPS and that Lake Huron with all its waters be protected by a Lakewide Management Plan as called for in the GLWQA.

Great Lakes United Jun 4 2000 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on Pickering "A" Nuclear Station

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:(1) Great Lakes United rcspcctfi~llyrc quests Canada's Minister of the Environment to appoint an independent panel to review the re-start of the Pickering "A" nuclear station; and (2) Great Lakes United respectfully requests the Environment Minister to instruct the panel to reconsider the scope of the review, and to include amongst other issues the review of a severe accident with loss of containment, alternative means of generating electricity, and an economic evaluation of the re-start proposal and its alternatives.

Great Lakes United Jun 4 2000 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on Regulating Mine Effluent

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Great Lakes United, in concert with its member
groups, will exert pressure upon the federal government of Canada to ensure that the following elements are in place prior to passing the revised regulation into law: Acute lethality tests based on both rainbow trout and Daphnia magna; Lowered limits for pollutants on the MMLER list of substances; A legal link between the Environmental Effects Monitoring Program and the regulation; A national toxicity registry to give Canadians access to important monitoring information.

Great Lakes United Jun 4 2000 Great Lakes United resolution
Resolution on Protecting the Zoar Valley Multiple Use Area

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Great Lakes United hereby supports full protection of all old growth from any logging or disturbance in Zoar Valley Multiple Use Areas and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United opposes any logging in the Valentine Flats and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Great Lakes United supports keeping Valentine Flats off limits to motorized vehicles.

Great Lakes United Jun 4 2000 Great Lakes United resolution